-
34. Feng, Y., Xiong, X., Shan, B., & Liu, C. (2022). Coulomb stress changes due to the 2021 MS7. 4 Maduo Earthquake and expected seismicity rate changes in the surroundings. Science China Earth Sciences, 65(4), 675-686.
-
33. Liu, C., Lay, T., & Xiong, X. (2022). The 29 July 2021 MW 8.2 Chignik, Alaska Peninsula Earthquake Rupture Inferred From Seismic and Geodetic Observations: Re‐Rupture of the Western 2/3 of the 1938 Rupture Zone. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(4), e2021GL096004.
-
32. Taymaz, T., Yolsal-Çevikbilen, S., Irmak, T. S., Vera, F., Liu, C., Eken, T., ... & Keleş, D. (2022). Kinematics of the 30 October 2020 Mw 7.0 Néon Karlovásion (Samos) earthquake in the Eastern Aegean Sea: Implications on source characteristics and dynamic rupture simulations. Tectonophysics, 229223.
-
31. Liu, C., Lay, T., Pollitz, F. F., Xu, J., & Xiong, X. (2021). Seismic and Geodetic Analysis of Rupture Characteristics of the 2020 M w 6.5 Monte Cristo Range, Nevada, Earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 111(6), 3226-3236.
-
30. Zhu, Y., Diao, F., Fu, Y., Liu, C., & Xiong, X. (2021). Slip rate of the seismogenic fault of the 2021 Maduo earthquake in western China inferred from GPS observations. Science China Earth Sciences, 64(8), 1363-1370.
